The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

On December 1st, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) began hearing oral arguments on the consolidation of at least 15 lawsuits filed by patients who have suffered alleged injuries resulting from the use of C-Qur polypropylene surgical mesh—an Omega 3-coated mesh used in the repair of hernias as well as traumatic injury and chest wall reconstruction. The Hudson, New Hampshire-based manufacturer, Atrium Medical Corporation, claims that the fish oil coating serves as an “adhesion barrier” that prevents the repair site from developing scar tissues that can sometimes inadvertently fuse with muscle and other organs. Many of the plaintiffs who have filed lawsuits claim that this coating has produced inflammation, infections and other foreign body reactions—leading to chronic pain, disability and the need for multiple corrective surgeries.

A similar situation arose earlier this year when Ethicon, Inc., a medical device manufacturer owned by Johnson & Johnson, voluntarily withdrew its Physiomesh flexible composite mesh device from the world market in the face of numerous lawsuits that have been filed in U.S. courts. In these cases, patients allege that the product led to unwanted internal adhesion that resulted in pain, limited mobility and organ damage—ultimately requiring the removal of the device. Other damages cited include hernia recurrence, infection, damage to the spermatic cord (infertility), and the perforation of blood vessels or organs.

Some of the Physiomesh cases also claim that the device manufacturers failed to fully determine what risks and consequences might manifest after implantation of the product. Ethicon has stated that the recall of the product was in response to two unpublished European studies that showed a higher than average revision rate following laparoscopic hernia repair. The company has expanded on the subject by claiming that the problems are due to multiple factors that could be attributed to both the product and the patient.

According to a recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association entitled Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated with Elective Incisional Hernia Repair, the use of surgical mesh usually has a lower risk of reoperation when compared to non-mesh hernia repair. Yet, the study also showed that mesh use had an increase in the rate of long-term complications by a factor of four or more—where only 0.8 percent of non-mesh repairs developed chronic issues compared to 3.7 percent for laparoscopic repairs and 5.6 percent for open repairs. While such data could indicate that the risk of complications is small, it’s important to note that often so is the chance of correcting the problem, as many of the plaintiffs allege that their injuries have caused permanent damage.


  1. Gravatar for Betty Scott
    Betty Scott

    After being an RN for 43 years and finding out no studies were ever done or complications reported on hernia mesh I think it is about time. Hernia mesh is used routine today without the knowledge of the patient that it has been used. Records were kept at the hospitals of all implants but no notification of complications are sent to patients, or FDA.

  2. Gravatar for Kirk Bernard
    Kirk Bernard

    2011 had 3D mesh put in for inguinal hernia, now I have major problems. R. testicle has collapsed, inconsistent urination, bowel movement issues, large lump on L. pelvis, R. pelvis swollen, chronic pain threw out the whole area. I can't seem to find anyone to diagnose my problem, don't know where to turn next, I need a phone number for someone willing to help. thanks Kirk (all meshed up)

  3. Gravatar for Empathy Jones
    Empathy Jones

    This post is for Kirk Bernard. I too had a similar reaction much more acutely though in the years that followed my hernia mesh implant. Your situation sounds painfully similar to what I have endured since late 2011 after having the initial surgery in June of 2011. Except my implant disintegrated and adhered to my intestines and broke up, some pieces grew into my major blood return from my leg. I had blood clots chronically for several years and a pulmonary embolism not mention the chronic groin pain that I will not describe here, so needless to say I feel your pain. The absolute hands down best help I found was from a surgeon Dr. Bruce Ramshaw, now the Chief of Surgery Univ. Tennessee - Knoxville, TN. He and his staff are amazing I trusted my life to him once and would do it again. He is a past President of the Surgical Society of Hernia Repair. The man is a person who truly cares about people and the well being of patients suffering with hernia disorders of all types, not to mention a world renowned reputation. Google him and do whatever you have to go see him. His is a God send Healer in my opinion. Good Luck and May God's Love Be With You.

Comments for this article are closed.