The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

In a recent post, I considered the history of the prescription drug OxyContin that, in the minds of many, has singularly opened a Pandora’s Box of widespread addiction and abuse—affecting an ever growing number of individuals and even entire communities throughout America.

While it might seem far-fetched that anyone involved in the development, production or marketing of this drug was able to foresee—or even purposely cause—the truly epidemic levels of opioid abuse we are currently facing, it has become clear that many of those who were involved with this product (especially the marketing of it) acted irresponsibly and with little regard for anything but profit.

As evidence of this behavior, one needs only look to Suffolk County, NY and its recently filing against the drug manufacturer Purdue. The lawsuit claims that Purdue used deceptive marketing to downplay the risks of the drug while also improperly driving physicians to prescribe the medication in atypical situations—ultimately leading to an oversaturation of the market, which in turn led to misappropriation and abuse.

The Suffolk lawsuit also purports that Purdue cost the taxpayers of Suffolk County money, both in paying for the prescription of unnecessary drugs as well as for public services provided in the way of emergency room care and substance abuse programs.

Adding to a long list of legal complaints from other communities that includes Orange County of California, the city of Chicago and the state of Mississippi, this current litigation shines a very bright light on the alleged misleading marketing practices of the OxyContin sales team as well as the man who oversaw Purdue Pharma during this aggressive era of misconduct, Dr. Richard Sackler.

The son of Purdue Pharma founder Raymond Sackler, Richard Sackler was recently questioned under oath about his aggressive and unorthodox marketing practices as part of a Kentucky court order, marking the first time any member of the Purdue founding family has commented on their role in fostering America’s dependency on opioids. While the lawsuit settled for $24 million to be paid out to this afflicted Appalachian state, it is most likely not the last time there will be connections made to the family name that most recently appeared on the Forbes list of America’s Richest Families—as few will deny that it was the marketing of OxyContin that propelled them to a net worth of $14 billion in less than two decades.

So are we approaching an end to this sordid story? It is hard to say. Unfortunately, OxyContin is not only still being manufactured and prescribed, but recent court actions involving Purdue’s patents have opened the door for generic manufacturers to now make the drug even more available and at a lower cost. In an attempt to expand their current market share, the company has recently gained FDA approval of OxyContin for use with children as young as 11 years old, and there is evidence that babies with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)—often caused by exposure to opioids like OxyContin while in the womb—is becoming one of the fastest growing newborn conditions in the U.S. Suffice to say, it will be of little surprise if lawsuits across the country continue to name OxyContin and Purdue Pharma for some time to come.

One Comment

  1. Gravatar for Paul Hemsil
    Paul Hemsil


    I have recently been reading about all the lawsuits filed against Purdue Pharma for the manufacture of the pain killing drug Oxycontin & all the people that became addicted to the drug.

    I was prescribed a massive 800mgs per day of Oxycontin for degenerative discs in my back around 7 years ago by my GP, though over the last two years I was taking more like 1500mgs per day due to addiction.

    At the time i was never, at any time told by my Dr how addictive Oxycontin was as I guess due to Purdue Pharma stating it was NONE addictive which was their marketing campaign! I didn't even know what an opiate or opioid was until I realised I had a serious issue with this drug. I had never taken any illegal drugs before becoming addicted to this, & they call this drug "Hillbilly Heroin" so, I suppose you could say that I became a junkie, addicted to Heroin through no fault, or choice of my own. And now I suffer daily, while Purdue Pharma are counting out their $Billions made while I, along with others became addicted & could only stand by & watch while our lives were slowly being destroyed, while being unable to do a damn thing about it!!!

    I was an Operations Manager on £50k per year with a new Lexus on my drive. Now, due to this drug I have lost everything, my job, my car, I cannot work due to memory loss, severe depression caused by the Oxycontin. I was suicidal. I didn't leave the house due to the depression & anxiety. I have been diagnosed with very low testosterone which is a side effect. I don't look forward to or enjoy anything anymore & it's all been caused by this addiction that I was never told about any of the side effects at the time. If i had, then I would have taken a different type of pain killer!

    To date, Purdue Pharma that manufacture Oxycontin have paid out around $640million in lawsuits to certain states in America,

    I have read loads regarding people addicted filing lawsuits against Purdue Pharma in USA & Canada but I don't know of any solicitor in the UK that would take my case on as Oxycontin is still a relatively unknown drug in the UK & not as much is known about it over here as it is over seas

    Thank you



Comments for this article are closed.