Contrary to conventional wisdom, an expert is not always needed in a medical negligence case since there are some deeds that even lay persons know are below the standard of care, and “]i]ndeed, a layperson would have no difficulty in recognizing Dr. Sharpe’s purported deviation from the standard of care in advising and undertaking to remove a gallbladder that he had previously removed.”
I would like to think this language from the Kentucky Law Blog would also apply to a medical malpractice case in Florida. However, my bet would be that a Florida court would, in fact, require the testimony of a medical expert to support even this case.
Some Medical Negligence is so obvious that an expert is not needed
MATHENEY V. SHARPE, MD
It is well-established that the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff in a medical malpractice case. Morris v. Hoffman, 551 S.W.2d 8 (Ky.App. 1977).
The negligence of a physician generally must be established by medical or expert testimony unless the negligence and “injurious results” are so apparent that a layperson with general knowledge would have no difficulty recognizing it. Id.; Johnson v. Vaughn, 370 S.W.2d 591 (Ky. 1963). See also Perkins v. Hausladen, 828 S.W.2d 652 (Ky. 1992).
In light of this admitted fact [the prior removal of the gallbladder, I presume], we are of the opinion that the alleged medical negligence of both Dr. Sharpe and Dr. Schwab was well within the general knowledge of a layperson. Indeed, a layperson would have no difficulty in recognizing Dr. Sharpe’s purported deviation from the standard of care in advising and undertaking to remove a gallbladder that he had previously removed.
Moreover, we, likewise, believe that a layperson would have no difficulty recognizing Dr. Schwab’s purported deviation from the standard of care in reading Matheney’s ultrasound as a diseased gallbladder, when, in fact, no gallbladder existed. Simply put, the alleged medical negligence is such that expert testimony was simply unnecessary.
I am reminded of the words, Fish gotta swim; birds gotta fly. Some docs gotta remove gallbladders.
The Legal Examiner and our Affiliate Network strive to be the place you look to for news, context, and more, wherever your life intersects with the law.
Comments for this article are closed.